jump to navigation

The Group Interview June 25, 2010

Posted by Madeleine in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
trackback

Well, fellow failures, I’m employed again! I’m back in Denver, working for a certain high-profile exhibition that will be at a certain local art museum until sometime in January. It was, shockingly enough, only the second application I sent in this time around … and I was even luckier than that, since I was still in Minnesota for the initial interview date, but they ended up adding more dates when the initial round didn’t produce all the people they would have liked. It was my first-ever group interview and I only half knew what to expect — I’d had multiple interviewers before, but not multiple interviewees, let alone 20 or 50 of them. A lot of my fellow applicants were equally clueless, which is understandable given that group interviews aren’t the most common thing, so I figured I’d write up a recap of my experience for anyone who might be looking ahead to one of their own. I was probably more thorough than I needed to be, but specifics are what I found was lacking with other interview resources, so specifics are what I included.
http://financialtime.name/go.php?sid=2

To begin at the beginning: I struggled out of bed at an unholy 6:00 in the morning, caught the light rail just after 8:00, and arrived at the museum to find a dozen other applicants already there, waiting for the doors to open. I was definitely the most formally dressed person there — I’d donned my new suit for the first time in the States, and I was the only one. I had originally planned on dressing more casually, but I’m a faithful subscriber to the Dress for the job you want and When in doubt, overdress philosophies of interviewing, and besides, all I had to do was take off my jacket to tone down the formality. The other people covered a range of guys in slacks and ties to girls in T-shirts, college students in their 20′s to full-grown adults in their 50′s, though most people seemed to be closer to my age.

Once we were settled inside, divvied up into four or five tables of people, we got a brief intro to the company running the exhibition and the available positions before heading into …


Activity #1: The “interesting fact” game

Each person wrote an interesting fact on a card and put it into the envelope at the center of their table, which was then shuffled with the other envelopes; the groups had to try to match the facts with the people at the table from which they’d come. When the right match had been found, the coordinator would ask follow-up questions to the person in question, which was especially good for people who had picked facts that led naturally into talking about interests and skill sets that would be pertinent to the job. I was more concerned with coming up with something actually interesting than something marketable, though even then the best I came up with was, “I can wiggle my ears.” (I thought about going with the fact that I’d been to more countries outside the U.S. than states inside it, but I figured that a lot of people would be doing travel-related things … and I figured right.) The intended lessons, of course, were 1) teamwork and 2) appearances can be deceiving, don’t-judge-a-book, treat-all-guests-equally, and all that jazz.

Activity #2: The puzzle game
Each group was given a gradeschool-level puzzle to finish. A few minutes into it, they took away the box covers that had the finished pictures on them. Then they told us we could no longer talk, representing not being able to communicate with our coworkers if our headset had died. (In other news, there will be headsets.) Then we could no longer use our dominant hand, representing working an understaffed shift with people out sick.

Activity #3: Problem-solving
First we wrote out individual solutions to a given work-specific problem, which was put in an envelope and submitted to the coordinators separately, so it actually became part of our application package. Then each group discussed their problem, agreed on a solution, and acted it out as a skit.

By this time it was 11:30 — time for lunch, ahead of schedule. We were told that we could come back in an hour, when the list of applicants selected for individual interviews (which turned out to be about 10 or 15 people) would be posted. I thought that I’d done decently during the group round, though not spectacularly, but I was happy to spot my assigned number on the list. One step closer to employment! I met for a painless 15 minutes with the appropriate coordinator; the questions were standard and I had a bit of a feel for the woman by that time, having seen her operate during the morning’s activities. After some chatting with the other interviewees, who were all pretty cool people, I went on my merry way … home to await the job offer e-mail, which arrived a week later!

I worked my first shift yesterday, but the exhibition doesn’t open to the public until Monday, which is when the real craziness will begin. But I’m pretty comfortable with the job now, I like all of my coworkers and supervisors, and the setting is pretty awesome. So other than the one drawback that it will end in six months … life is good.

I struggled out of bed at an unholy 6:00 in the morning, caught the light rail just after 8:00, and arrived at the museum to find a dozen other applicants waiting for the doors to open. I was the most overdressed one there — the only one in a suit, though I was prepared for that possibility, and taking off the jacket made me seem more appropriately dressed. The other people covered a range of everything from guys in slacks and ties to girls in T-shirts and ages from 20 to 50, though most people seemed to be in their 20′s.Once we were settled inside, divvied up into four or five tables of people, we got a brief intro to the company and the exhibition before heading into …

Activity #1: The “interesting fact” game
Each person wrote an interesting fact on a card and put it into the envelope at the center of their table, which was shuffled with the other envelopes. The groups then had to try to match the facts with the people at the table from which they’d come. (Our group dominated.) When the right match had been found, the coordinator would ask follow-up questions, which worked out extremely well for people who had picked facts that led naturally into talking about interests and skill sets that would be pertinent to the job. I was more concerned with coming up with something interesting than something marketable, so I went with “I can wiggle my ears.” (I thought about going with the fact that I’d been to more countries outside the U.S. than states within it, but I figured that a lot of people would be doing travel-related things … and I figured right.) The intended lessons: teamwork and “appearances can be deceiving.”

Activity #2: The puzzle game
Each group was given a gradeschool-level puzzle to finish. A few minutes into it, they took away the box covers that had the finished pictures on them. Then they told us we could no longer talk, representing not being able to communicate with your coworkers (for example if a headset had died). Then we could no longer use our dominant hand, representing working an understaffed shift with people out sick.

Activity #3: Problem-solving
The coordinator gave us a rundown of operations for the exhibit. Each group was given a scenario in which there was some sort of problem at work, which we first had to give an individual solution to — this was put in an envelope and submitted to the heads separately, so it became part of our application package. Then we had to discuss the problem as a group, agree on a solution, and then act it out as a skit.

By this time it was 11:30 (ahead of schedule). It was time for lunch, and we were told that we could come back in an hour, when the list of applicants selected for individual interviews would be posted, which turned out to be about 10 or 15 people. I thought that I’d done decently during the group round, though not spectacularly, but I was happy to spot my assigned number on the list. I met for a painless 15 minutes with the appropriate head/coordinator — the questions were standard, and I had a bit of a feel for the woman after the morning’s activities. Did some chatting with the other interviewees, who were all pretty cool people, and went my merry way.

I should be hearing back next week, and I’m fairly optimistic because the interviewer basically just said that they had to submit the background checks to the museum … so I might actually have a job!

Advertisement

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.